IELTS Essay | Many countries spend a lot of money to train individuals to participate in international sporting events.


IELTS essay|Many countries spend  a lot of money to train individuals to participate in international sporting events

Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:

Many countries spend a lot of money to train individuals to participate in international sporting events. Some people say that this money would be better spent on public development instead.

Do you agree or disagree?

Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


IELTS Essay | Spending money on international sporting events

While some people may not agree with the financing of training for individual athletes to compete in international sports events, such events are undoubtedly important for a country in terms of global recognition and especially inspiring the young generation to compete on the global stage.

Most athletes, unless already famous, do not receive large salaries; however, coaching and equipment for training can be quite expensive. In cases where an athlete becomes successful internationally, especially in the case of the Olympic Games and other world class sports events, the financial reward for the country as whole can be substantial, and help in development of all sports within the country, which, in a way, is a type of investment in the public, even though it targets mainly youth.

While it is true that the same money used to train athletes could simply be spent on public infrastructure development, the actual amount of money and what could be achieved on a national scale with the money needs careful consideration. When compared with the costs of financing road and rail infrastructure construction and other public development projects, the cost of financially supporting individual athletes that represent the country at an international level is relatively insignificant; it is unlikely that large scale public development projects would be achieved with such relatively small funding.

Overall, clearly there will always be a conflict between those who consider essential public spending is more important than non-essential spending; however, the definition of essential spending could also be debated, as some would consider international representation at international and global sports events is just as important for the long term development of a country as spending the same money on other public projects.

Personally, I believe that the wide ranging benefits obtained from athletes competing at an international level, such as inspiring young people to take up a sport, international recognition for a country, and the sense of national pride which accompanies success, far outweigh the relatively small cost of such endeavours and is, therefore, a wholly worthwhile investment of public funds




Comments